Fitness data for Rv3888c in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

Probable conserved membrane protein

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.5)

group	condition	fitness	t score
stress	7H9 with Menadione 0.005 mM	-0.5	-2.0	compare
stress	7H9 with Dibucaine 0.21 mM	-0.5	-1.5	compare
stress	7H9 with Ethionamide 0.1 ug/mL	-0.5	-1.6	compare
stress	7H9 with Antimycin A 0.0186 mM	+0.5	+2.1	compare
stress	7H9 with Lomefloxacin 0.0035 mM	+0.5	+2.3	compare
stress	7H9 with Linezolid 0.3 ug/mL	+0.5	+1.5	compare
stress	7H9 with Phenazine ethosulfate 0.0137 mM	+0.5	+2.4	compare
stress	7H9 with Cumene hydroperoxide 0.05 mM	+0.5	+1.0	compare
no stress control	no stress control	+0.5	+1.7	compare
stress	7H9 with Pretomanid 0.213 ug/mL	+0.5	+2.7	compare
stress	7H9 with Benzethonium chloride 0.068 mM	+0.5	+1.7	compare
stress	7H9 with Ethambutol 0.75 ug/mL	+0.5	+1.7	compare
stress	7H9 with Lomefloxacin 0.0035 mM	+0.5	+2.2	compare
stress	7H9 with 8-hydroxy-nitroquinoline 0.03 mM	+0.5	+3.2	compare
stress	7H9 with Dicloxacillin 0.0069 mM	+0.5	+2.0	compare
nitrogen source	L-Valine 10 mM (N)	+0.5	+2.6	compare
stress	7H9 with Cloxacillin 0.0386 mM	+0.6	+1.4	compare
stress	7H9 with Phenazine methosulfate 0.0054 mM	+0.6	+2.2	compare
stress	7H9 with Spectinomycin 0.029 mM	+0.7	+0.8	compare
nitrogen source	L-Glutamic 10 mM (N)	+0.7	+2.9	compare