Fitness data for Rv2132 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

Conserved hypothetical protein

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.5)

group	condition	fitness	t score
stress	7H9 with Chlorpromazine 0.054 mM	-0.8	-1.6	compare
stress	7H9 with Rifampicin 0.014 ug/mL	-0.7	-1.8	compare
stress	7H9 with Phenazine ethosulfate 0.0137 mM	-0.7	-1.5	compare
stress	7H9 with Econazole nitrate salt 0.0082 mM	-0.7	-1.5	compare
stress	7H9 with Dimethyl Sulfoxide 1 vol%	-0.6	-1.3	compare
stress	7H9 with methylglyoxal 1.2 mM	-0.6	-1.4	compare
stress	7H9 with Thioridazine 0.028 mM	-0.6	-1.6	compare
stress	7H9 with Menadione 0.005 mM	-0.6	-1.6	compare
stress	7H9 with Phenazine ethosulfate 0.0137 mM	-0.5	-1.2	compare
stress	7H9 with 2-Mercaptopyridine N-oxide 0.0078 mM	-0.5	-1.0	compare
stress	7H9 with Chloramphenicol 0.01 mM	-0.5	-1.4	compare
stress	7H9 with Plumbagin 0.01 mM	-0.5	-1.1	compare
stress	7H9 with Malondialdehyde tetrabutylammonium salt 0.96 mM	-0.5	-1.6	compare
pH	pH 5.5	+0.5	+1.1	compare
stress	7H9 with Ceftriaxone hemi(heptahydrate) 0.12 mM	+0.6	+1.2	compare
stress	7H9 with Pretomanid 0.213 ug/mL	+0.6	+1.1	compare
stress	7H9 with 2,4-Dinitrophenol 0.1503 mM	+0.6	+1.7	compare
no stress control	no stress control	+0.6	+1.7	compare
stress	7H9 with Levofloxacin 0.3 ug/mL	+0.7	+2.8	compare
pH	7H9 pH 5.5	+0.9	+1.4	compare