Fitness data for Rv2660c in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

Hypothetical protein

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.5)

group	condition	fitness	t score
stress	7H9 with Cumene hydroperoxide 0.05 mM	-1.1	-1.8	compare
stress	7H9 with Phenazine ethosulfate 0.0137 mM	-1.0	-2.2	compare
stress	7H9 with Pyrazinamide 50 ug/mL; pH 5.5	-0.8	-2.0	compare
no stress control	no stress control	-0.7	-1.8	compare
carbon source	acetate (C)	-0.6	-1.7	compare
stress	7H9 with Levofloxacin 0.3 ug/mL	-0.6	-1.7	compare
stress	7H9 with Antimycin A 0.0186 mM	-0.6	-2.1	compare
stress	7H9 with Geneticin G418 0.35 mM	-0.6	-1.0	compare
no stress control	no stress control	-0.6	-1.8	compare
carbon source	oleate 200uM (C)	-0.6	-1.7	compare
carbon source	acetate (C)	-0.6	-1.8	compare
stress	7H9 with 2,4-Dinitrophenol 0.1503 mM	-0.5	-1.5	compare
stress	7H9 with Antimycin A 0.0186 mM	+0.5	+1.0	compare
stress	7H9 with Moxifloxacin 0.121 ug/mL	+0.5	+1.3	compare
stress	7H9 with Phenazine methosulfate 0.0054 mM	+0.5	+1.3	compare
no stress control	no stress control	+0.5	+2.5	compare
no stress control	no stress control	+0.6	+2.1	compare
stress	7H9 with Chlorhexidine diacetate salt 0.0021 mM	+0.6	+2.0	compare
stress	7H9 with EDTA (disodium salt) 0.2 mM	+0.6	+2.1	compare
stress	7H9 with 2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3-propanediol 0.1 mM	+0.6	+2.0	compare