Fitness data for Rv1869c in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

Probable reductase
KEGG:

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.2)

group	condition	fitness	t score
stress	7H9 with Ethionamide 0.1 ug/mL	-0.9	-4.1	compare
stress	7H9 with Isoniazid 0.025 ug/mL	-0.5	-1.6	compare
stress	7H9 with Ofloxacin 0.8 ug/mL	-0.4	-2.2	compare
stress	7H9 with Isoniazid 0.025 ug/mL	-0.4	-1.8	compare
stress	7H9 with Moxifloxacin 0.121 ug/mL	-0.4	-2.2	compare
no stress control	no stress control	-0.3	-1.8	compare
no stress control	no stress control	-0.3	-1.3	compare
stress	7H9 with Ethionamide 0.1 ug/mL	-0.3	-1.0	compare
stress	7H9 with Ofloxacin 0.8 ug/mL	-0.2	-0.9	compare
stress	7H9 with Pretomanid 0.213 ug/mL	+0.2	+1.1	compare
nitrogen source	L-Glutamic 10 mM (N)	+0.2	+1.2	compare
nitrogen source	L-Aspartic Acid 10 mM (N)	+0.3	+1.5	compare
nitrogen source	L-Serine 10 mM (N)	+0.3	+1.3	compare
carbon source	D,L-Malic Acid 10 mM (C)	+0.3	+1.1	compare
carbon source	heptadecanoic 250 uM (C)	+0.3	+1.4	compare
stress	7H9 with Bedaquiline 0.15 ug/mL	+0.3	+1.4	compare
stress	7H9 with Hygromycin B 0.0095 mM	+0.4	+1.6	compare
no stress control	no stress control	+0.4	+2.4	compare
no stress control	no stress control	+0.4	+2.4	compare
stress	7H9 with Dimethyl Sulfoxide 1 vol%	+0.6	+2.8	compare