Fitness data for GFF1691 in Sphingobium sp. HT1-2

Two-component transcriptional response regulator, LuxR family
SEED: Two-component response regulator
KEGG: two-component system, LytT family, response regulator AlgR

All 18 fitness values, sorted by value


Add gene:

Or see all 18 experiments or choose conditions

group condition fitness t score  
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Putrescine -0.1 -0.4 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with D-Glucose and Ammonium Sulfate -0.1 -0.4 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Ammonium Sulfate -0.0 -0.3 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with D-Glucose and Ammonium Sulfate -0.0 -0.3 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Putrescine -0.0 -0.2 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Putrescine -0.0 -0.2 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Ammonium Sulfate -0.0 -0.1 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Ammonium Sulfate -0.0 -0.1 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Ammonium Sulfate -0.0 -0.0 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with D-Glucose and Ammonium Sulfate +0.0 +0.0 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Putrescine +0.0 +0.3 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Ammonium Sulfate +0.1 +0.4 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Putrescine +0.1 +0.5 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with D-Glucose and Ammonium Sulfate +0.1 +0.5 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Putrescine +0.1 +0.7 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with D-Glucose and Ammonium Sulfate +0.1 +0.9 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with D-Glucose and Ammonium Sulfate +0.2 +1.2 compare
carbon and nitrogen source EMM_noCarbon with Sucrose and Ammonium Sulfate +0.3 +1.9 compare