Fitness data for EX28DRAFT_3138 in Enterobacter asburiae PDN3

Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein
SEED: Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I (serine chemoreceptor protein)
KEGG: methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein II, aspartate sensor receptor

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.2)

group	condition	fitness	t score
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=rhizosphere; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.3	-1.6	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.3	-1.0	compare
stress	MS_media with arsenate 5 mM	-0.3	-1.6	compare
no stress control	MS_media no stress control	-0.3	-1.7	compare
no stress control	MS_media no stress control	-0.3	-1.6	compare
stress	MS_media with arsenate 5 mM	-0.3	-1.3	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	-0.2	-1.2	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	-0.2	-1.1	compare
stress	MS_media with arsenate 5 mM	-0.2	-1.3	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=rhizosphere; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=1_hours	-0.2	-1.0	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=rhizosphere; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.2	-1.1	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	-0.2	-1.0	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	-0.2	-0.9	compare
stress	MS_media with arsenate 5 mM	-0.2	-1.0	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	-0.2	-0.8	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	-0.2	-0.7	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	-0.2	-1.0	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	-0.2	-0.9	compare
no stress control	MS_media no stress control	-0.2	-0.9	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.2	+1.0	compare