Fitness data for EX28DRAFT_2932 in Enterobacter asburiae PDN3

Response regulator of citrate/malate metabolism
SEED: Transcriptional regulatory protein CitB, DpiA
KEGG: two-component system, CitB family, response regulator CitB

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.2)

group	condition	fitness	t score
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.3	-0.8	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=rhizosphere; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=1_hours	-0.3	-0.7	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.3	-0.9	compare
no stress control	MS_media no stress control	-0.3	-1.3	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.2	-0.7	compare
stress	MS_media with m-arsenite 1 mM	-0.2	-0.9	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.2	+0.7	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.2	+1.0	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.2	+1.2	compare
no stress control	MS_media no stress control	+0.2	+1.2	compare
stress	MS_media with arsenate 5 mM	+0.2	+1.5	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.3	+1.5	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.3	+1.2	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.3	+1.5	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.3	+1.8	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.4	+2.5	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.4	+2.2	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.5	+1.9	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.5	+3.0	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.5	+2.0	compare