Fitness data for EX28DRAFT_2746 in Enterobacter asburiae PDN3

hypothetical protein
SEED: FIG00626576: hypothetical protein
KEGG: putative MFS transporter, AGZA family, xanthine/uracil permease

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.6)

group	condition	fitness	t score
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-1.0	-1.2	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.8	-1.0	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=rhizosphere; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.8	-0.9	compare
stress	MS_media with m-arsenite 1 mM	-0.7	-1.3	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.6	+1.1	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.6	+2.0	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.7	+1.0	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.7	+1.6	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.7	+1.6	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.7	+1.6	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.7	+1.7	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.8	+2.3	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.8	+1.9	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.8	+2.0	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.8	+2.1	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.9	+2.7	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+1.0	+2.3	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	+1.0	+1.7	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+1.3	+2.3	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+1.5	+3.3	compare