Fitness data for EX28DRAFT_2528 in Enterobacter asburiae PDN3

competence protein ComEA helix-hairpin-helix repeat region
SEED: FIG01200701: possible membrane protein
KEGG: competence protein ComEA

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.3)

group	condition	fitness	t score
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.5	-1.0	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=rhizosphere; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	-0.4	-1.0	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=rhizosphere; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=1_hours	-0.4	-0.9	compare
stress	MS_media with m-arsenite 1 mM	-0.4	-1.5	compare
stress	MS_media with m-arsenite 1 mM	-0.3	-1.0	compare
no stress control	MS_media no stress control	-0.3	-1.1	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.3	+1.0	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.3	+1.4	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.3	+1.1	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.3	+1.0	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.3	+1.5	compare
in planta	Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days	+0.4	+0.7	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.4	+1.2	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.4	+1.3	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.4	+1.5	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.4	+1.3	compare
stress	M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.5	+1.4	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.5	+1.6	compare
stress	M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM	+0.5	+2.6	compare
no stress control	M9 with sucrose; no stress control	+0.6	+2.4	compare