Fitness data for EX28DRAFT_0341 in Enterobacter asburiae PDN3

2-succinyl-6-hydroxy-2,4-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate synthase
SEED: 2-succinyl-6-hydroxy-2,4-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate synthase (EC 4.2.99.20)
KEGG: 2-succinyl-6-hydroxy-2,4-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate synthase

Top 20 experiments with the strongest phenotypes (|fitness| ≥ 0.4)


Add gene:

Or see all 54 experiments or choose conditions

group condition fitness t score  
no stress control MS_media no stress control -0.6 -1.2 compare
in planta Plant=poplar; PlantTreatment=None; Sample=roots; GrowthSubstrate=quartz_sand; Collection=outgrowth_in_MGL; Time=7_days -0.4 -0.7 compare
no stress control M9 with sucrose; no stress control +0.4 +1.1 compare
stress M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.4 +0.9 compare
no stress control M9 with sucrose; no stress control +0.4 +0.7 compare
stress M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.4 +1.0 compare
stress M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.4 +1.5 compare
stress M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.4 +0.9 compare
stress M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.4 +1.6 compare
stress MS_media with arsenate 5 mM +0.5 +1.0 compare
stress M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.5 +1.5 compare
stress M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.5 +1.6 compare
stress M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.6 +1.0 compare
no stress control M9 with sucrose; no stress control +0.6 +1.8 compare
stress M9 with sucrose and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.7 +1.0 compare
no stress control M9 with sucrose; no stress control +0.7 +1.5 compare
no stress control M9 with sucrose; no stress control +0.7 +1.1 compare
no stress control M9 with sucrose; no stress control +0.7 +2.4 compare
stress M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.8 +2.9 compare
stress M9 with casaminos and trichloroethylene 76.3 uM +0.8 +2.8 compare